Edit ModuleShow Tags

The need for speed


One Friday years ago, I called a friend who was a marketing manager at a large company to see if he wanted to have a beer after work. I asked him about his week, and he reported that he'd spent it designing a one-page brochure (if you're under 25, that's a piece of paper). An entire week! And that was before it went to the graphic designers. I was flabbergasted. I'm all for quality and proofreading, but one page (even fewer with pictures) in a week?

Speed is often a significant advantage. Faster to market, less executive time, higher ROI. However, we often get caught up in our perceptions about how long something should take. Another friend who's the CEO of a large organization wanted some software written to solve a problem. His internal team of 300 told him it would take a year. He got it done in a week by posting a requirements document on the web and taking bids. Clearly, too many projects in the system can also cause this problem. In this case, however, it was more likely about a free-market solution versus a centrally controlled environment.

I've seen three major impediments to speed in organizational performance.

First, we often confuse process with objectives. They're significantly different. For instance, I sometimes get calls from people who want me to facilitate an "off-site strategic planning meeting." When I ask why, I often find that the real objective is: a) to fill time, b) to continue with the tradition, c) to entertain the troops or d) unknown.

Not one of those is a good reason. When I pursued a line of questioning recently with an executive who initially wanted a "strategic planning session," the need I uncovered had to do with a companywide lack of accountability, which required a different solution. If you first clearly identify the objective by asking hard questions, you can then determine how to address the issue most effectively. Ask "what" first, then "how."

Second, you can often achieve the objective (notice I didn't say "the most elegant solution") much more quickly than your initial assumption. It's helpful to ask, "What if we had to do this in 10 percent of the time we allocated?" Once you survive the initial incredulous looks, you just might come up with some very unique answers and save a lot of time.

Last, it's about success, not perfection. Oftentimes, squeezing out the last 10% of a project can take an inordinate amount of resources and time with little or no increase in quality. Clearly define the objective and meet it. When someone asks you to repaint the Sistine Chapel and improve the quality ... then you can take your time!
{pagebreak:Page 1}

Edit Module
Todd Ordal

Todd Ordal is president of Applied Strategy®. Todd helps CEOs achieve better financial results, become more effective leaders and sleep easier at night. He is a former CEO and has led teams as large as 7,000. Todd is the author of Never Kick a Cow Chip On A Hot Day: Real Lessons for Real CEOs and Those Who Want To Be (Morgan James Publishing, 2016). Connect with Todd on LinkedIn, Twitter, call 303-527-0417 or email todd@toddordal.com.

Get more of our current issue | Subscribe to the magazine | Get our Free e-newsletter

Edit ModuleShow Tags

Archive »Related Articles

How to create an inspired team

The person who combines technique with inspiration will eclipse the leader who only relies on technique ― every dang time! Can you learn inspiration? I don’t think so. But can you find it?

Here's a road-trip vehicle you're going to love

Okay, so this vehicle doesn’t get the best gas mileage on the planet, but I just can’t imagine a better road vehicle.

When your conscience and your bottom line butt heads

You’re halfway through a home remodel and you realize you sourced the materials from a company that’s recently made egregious environmental violations. Now what?
Edit ModuleShow Tags

Thanks for contributing to our community-- please keep your comments in good taste and appropriate for our business professional readers.

Add your comment: