More By This Author

Current Issue

Current Issue

Posted: July 20, 2011

America’s moral compass

A list of things we must remember

By John Heckers

The ideologues in Washington are getting very close to causing our country to default on many promises it has made to many people. This will dramatically affect your job, whether you have a job now, are in business now, or are looking for employment. People will lose jobs, the economy will go into a double dip recession (or worse), and businesses will go bankrupt - maybe yours - as billions are pulled out the economy.

There are some important things I believe we have forgotten as a nation. These forgotten things are what made this nation great. If we do not remember them, we will, indeed, be nothing better than a Third World America. Here is a list of the things I believe we, as a nation, must remember.

1). The needs of the vulnerable must trump the needs (and wants) of the powerful. The unemployed, the poor, the disabled, children, battered women, elders, and others who are the most vulnerable must be looked after before multi-millionaires and billionaires. It is plain wrong that the deficit is being balanced on the backs of these folks when some in Congress are unwilling to close tax loopholes for the very wealthy, corporate jets, and the nation's most profitable corporations. It is shameful that we are giving corporations welfare when we, as a nation, are unwilling to help the vulnerable among us. It is both immoral and un-American.

2). Jobs matter more than light bulbs. Do you know what Congress was doing last week while the nation's solvency hangs in the balance? They were debating the repeal of a Bush-era law that is phasing out energy-hogging incandescent light bulbs. Yep! Instead of fixing our debt problem or putting together a program to get Americans back to work, Rep. Peter King of NY introduced a repeal of this law, saying that it infringed on "personal freedom" to save the country billions of dollars in energy costs through phasing out an inefficient, heat producing and often dangerous product. Please!

3). "Personal Freedom" is not absolute. There are some in this country who narcissistically believe that they should be able to do whatever they wish to do in the name of "personal freedom." I hate to tell you this, but that is not patriotism. That is anarchy. All of us who live with others have many limits and boundaries, rightfully so, to our personal freedom.

4). Everyone must pay his or her fair share. There is not one person in America who does not pay taxes in one form or another, including the homeless. But there are those whose income is taxed at a very low percentage rate, or even at a 0 percent rate. It is the very wealthy who have lawyers and bought and paid for elected officials to keep them from having to pitch in. Anyone with two working brain cells knows that this is immoral and wrong. So why do our elected officials keep them from paying taxes? To quote Ross Perot, "Follow the money!"

5). Government is not always the solution, but sometimes it is. There is a belief among certain folks that private industry is somehow sacred and government is always evil. Sometimes the private sector is the solution. Sometimes government is the solution. Sometimes either government or the private sector are the problem. But this ideological fanaticism that sees everything the private sector does as right and everything government does as wrong is just crazy.

6). It is time for a jobs program. People need to work. If we wait for "the market" we'll be waiting a very long time. Our government has a responsibility to "the general welfare." That is from the most radical and liberal document ever written: The United States Constitution. Putting people to work should be the absolute priority of our government, not reducing the deficit, not debating light bulbs, and not discussing Michelle Obama's hamburger choice.

7). We cannot have a good economy with crumbling infrastructure. America is crumbling! This means that people, especially those who can afford it, will have to pony up some taxes to keep bridges from collapsing (as many have) and highways from falling apart. America needs repair!

I am sure that these reminders of what America should be will not sit well with everyone. But I'll bet they sit well with the majority of Americans. In fact, polls show that they do. Elections, indeed, have consequences. Let us hope that the consequences do not include the destruction of the United States of America.

Join John and Nicole Heckers and Nicole Raphael Monday, July 25th at the DAC, for "Making Money and Finding Success Through Real Spiritual Principles." For more info and to register go here.

{pagebreak:Page 1}

 

John Heckers, MA, CPC, BCPC is an Executive Transition Coach and Executive Coach in Denver, Colorado with 30 years of experience in helping people with their careers. Please join in the discussion below or contact him privately at jheckers@heckersdev.com. Can't get enough Heckers? Sign up for our free "Career Tip of the Week" here and read John's executive blog here .

Enjoy this article? Sign up to get ColoradoBiz Exclusives. The opinions expressed in this article are solely that of the author and do not represent ColoradoBiz magazine. Comments on articles will be removed if they include personal attacks.

Readers Respond

The range of comments to John Heckers’ column is a reminder of how far apart we as a people have become. Too many folks accept as the gospel truth -anything- in print, in their inbox or on the airwaves. Opinion is routinely accepted as fact. Vitriol passes for debate. A discussion of American politics is appropriate in a business publication, especially in light of current events. Our 536 elected officials in D.C. are about ready to crash the “good ship Uncle Sam” on the rocks...which will take out jobs and prosperity in the process. Interestingly, American political philosophy has shifted far to the right in the last 50 years. What used to be thought of as "conservative" and/or "good government" are now considered far left or even socialist. For example...President Eisenhower called for a massive investment in this country's infrastructure, rebuffed the idea of large tax breaks for the richest Americans (while defending high tax rates which were only on a portion of income), and warned anyone who would mess with Social Security to keep their hands off. He also said workers have a right to organize and to bargain collectively. Ike called a strong, free-labor movement an invigorating and necessary part of our society. Surprisingly, the Republican Party platform of 1956 called for an expansion of Social Security, broader unemployment insurance, and better health care for all of our citizens. It called for increasing the minimum wage to cover more workers, improved job safety, and equal pay regardless of gender. If Eisenhower wanted to run for office today, he’d have to run as an independent (with Bernie Sanders at his side). At the end of the day, though, the morality of our government will be measured by how we value and treat the weakest and most vulnerable among us. By Tony Peccolo on 2011 07 23
"Emigrate to Somalia. You'll love it. No taxes or anyone telling you what to do. No wasteful social programs. Just good old every man for himself freedom and no real government interference in your life. Just watch out for the pirates." Seriously, this is pretty daft. Of course we need government to protect us from violent criminals, invasion, etc. But do we really need $7 TRILLION a year of government? Did LA *have* to build a $500M high school? Do the Feds have to blow billions a year subsidizing *sugar*? Should millionaires get Social Security and Medicare checks? Should Obama be spending money to buy assault weapons for Mexican drug lords? We need to identify our priorities and cut everything else. The left isn't even trying. Obama could and should identify $100B a year in easy cuts in the same way the states are - but can't be bothered to do so. Apparently, neither can any liberal, as no left winger has bothered to provide a single serious plan to cut any government fat. Obama has even refused to implement something easy like a pay or hiring freeze. This is absolutely incompetent management. Worse, actually - all he cares about is punishing his political opponents through higher taxes and rewarding his political friends through government handouts. That is utter corruption. It's not Republican's proposed cuts that will destroy this country - it is the use of taxpayer money to buy votes that will end us. We're not saying to throw the baby out with the bathwater. But the government simply cannot be a source of easy cash for everyone with a politician's ear. By Jawaid Bazyar on 2011 07 21
Great piece, John. As much as the Anthony case was a tragedy, I wish people were half as outraged by the behavior and issues you raised. As far as a number of the "rebuttals" made to your points, I would make this suggestion. Emigrate to Somalia. You'll love it. No taxes or anyone telling you what to do. No wasteful social programs. Just good old every man for himself freedom and no real government interference in your life. Just watch out for the pirates. By Fred on 2011 07 21
Jesus, in the church that He established in the meridian of time, and in His church today did not and does not use government as the vehicle to care for the poor (next time you are in Salt Lake City, visit Welfare Square for a prime example). John Gimple in his comment here has it right - when in a position of need, whether temporary or permanent, an individual's first recource is his family, second is his church. This is the hard reality. As prophesied by Isaiah in the same Bible already quoted here, we have made good evil (rejected, marginalized and demonized religion) and evil good - government IS the religion of a growing number. Mr. Heckers, are you a member of a lame church that is unable to do anything for the poor? To transfer responsibility for the poor to the government is to strip oneself of charity and truly represents a loss of moral compass - as well as common sense! I'm not concerned about losing this argument. Government has spent billions and (barring a default) will no doubt continue to spend billions in it's effort to "eradicate poverty" and has failed, is failing, and will always fail. I'm not inclined to keep throwing good money after bad (see the definition of insanity). Mr. Gimple is right. You feel a different motivation when you know you are going to have to ask your family for assistance than when your plan is to file for government assistance and game the system for up to 99 weeks. By Matthew Lewis on 2011 07 21
Once again Heckers runs away without dealing with even one of his factual inconsistancies. Of course that's after he goes to a really "high place" to make us all unChristian and unholy. Plus, regarding "disingenuous", there's a picture in the dictionary next to that word: it's John Heckers. Perhaps we should be glad he's retiring because there's no discernable value in interacting with him anyway. By Robert on 2011 07 21
John, I must have missed the part of the Bible where Jesus said that you should practice charity by first stealing the money from others. In fact, I believe there is a very clear proscription against "robbing Peter to pay Paul". There is a world of difference between *voluntary* charity, which is what all your Jesus quotes refer to - and compulsory, coerced "charity". What kind of "charity" is it that requires the use of force against an unwilling "donor"? Be generous -- or else? That was not Jesus' message and you are being disingenuous for trying to claim that it is. By Jawaid Bazyar on 2011 07 21
While I am not going to respond to individual comments, there are a couple of quotes I'd like to share. The person who said these is the major inspiration for my belief system on these issues. "Then the king will say to those at his right hand, "Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me." He sat down opposite the treasury, and watched the crowd putting money into the treasury. Many rich people put in large sums. 42 A poor widow came and put in two small copper coins, which are worth a penny. 43 Then he called his disciples and said to them, "Truly I tell you, this poor widow has put in more than all those who are contributing to the treasury. 44 For all of them have contributed out of their abundance; but she out of her poverty has put in everything she had, all she had to live on." "There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and who feasted sumptuously every day. And at his gate lay a poor man named Lazarus, covered with sores, who longed to satisfy his hunger with what fell from the rich man's table; even the dogs would come and lick his sores. The poor man died and was carried away by the angels to be with Abraham. The rich man also died and was buried. In Hades, where he was being tormented, he looked up and saw Abraham far away with Lazarus by his side. He called out, 'Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue; for I am in agony in these flames.' But Abraham said, 'Child, remember that during your lifetime you received your good things, and Lazarus in like manner evil things; but now he is comforted here, and you are in agony. Does anyone know who this "left of Lenin" guy is who said these things? This is the last comment I will make. Have fun guys! By John Heckers, MA, CPC, BCPC on 2011 07 21
Mr. Heckers: The moral compass has been lost, but I would say that it has more to do with government than not. The ever increasing number of government social programs has turned the government into the surrogate family. Instead of family members helping each other, every perceived hardship is now that of the government and ultimately the taxpayers. This has the effect of people taking less responsibility for their actions. It is much easier to ask a faceless government entity for help than it is of a friend or family member. If the family member's situation is due to a lack of motivation or habitual bad choices, the family can wise up and stop support. The government doesn't and never will have the resources to know when a dead beat is a dead beat, so they just create another program. Charity comes from morality. Is forced charity through taxation moral? By John Gimple on 2011 07 21
Dave Lucia: where did *you* get the right to take unlimited and unaccountable amounts of money from your neighbors? And, can you explain to me why taking 50% of everything isn't enough for you? Government takes 50% today. Do you think it needs to be more? In that case, you need to explain *how much* more and *why*. Otherwise, I would be a fool to keep giving you more money, wouldn't I? This is like the teenager who comes to his dad every day: Son: I need $50 Dad: ok (next day) Son: I need another $50 Dad: why? Son: just cause (next day) Son: I need another $50 Dad: I just gave you $100. Why do you need another $50? Son: to help the poor! Do you see how this argument wears thin? How it wears thin after 75 years of complaints that we're not taking care of the poor? How can we possibly NOT be "taking care of the vulnerable" with $7 TRILLION a year taxed away and spent by Government? After 75 years of socialism in America, it's time for us to wake up and stop the madness. By Jawaid Bazyar on 2011 07 20
As always, I find your article direct,to the point and wonderfully written. This is what needs to be said. I look forward to your future articles. By Joy Dillon on 2011 07 20

Leave a comment





Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:



ColoradoBiz TV

Loading the player ...

Featured Video