More By This Author

And now, for some good news

The economy's getting stronger

The latest economic numbers:

As exciting as kissing your sister

U.S. versus Japan

Whose economic woes were worst?

As the nation goes, so goes Colorado

Stronger economic numbers are good news for small business

State’s small business benefits from U.S. job gains

Vectra Bank Colorado Small Business Index rises slightly in February

Current Issue

 
Jeff Thredgold Posted 07.29.2010

Health care: So how’s it going, Canada?

Is your system working?

By Jeff Thredgold
 

Supporters of America's move toward a government-controlled health care system frequently make reference to similar "successful" programs in other nations. A glimpse at three such national programs seems timely.

Canada

A recent Reuters headline noted, "Soaring Costs Force Canada to Reassess Health Model." The article notes that with pressure from an aging population and the need to rein in budget deficits, Canada's provinces are taking tough measures to curb healthcare costs.

Healthcare in Canada is delivered through a publicly funded system, which covers all "medically necessary" hospital and physician care. It now accounts for roughly 40 percent of provincial budgets. Such spending was a mere 7 percent of provincial government expenditures in the 1970s (Investor's Business Daily).

Rationing of health care, including reasonable access to specialists, is a major, and sometimes deadly, problem. It has become an all too common practice that when wealthier people or high-level Canadian political leaders require immediate access to health care, they routinely come to the U.S.

Once banned by law, private-sector health care clinics are expanding across Canada. Health care funding and the word "crisis" go hand-in-hand in Canada today.

Cuba

This largely failed Socialist nation 90 miles from Florida prides itself on high-quality health care. However, the system is broken, and is slowly bankrupting the nation.

Cuba boasts of having the best doctor-patient ratio in the world, with one doctor for every 170 people, versus one doctor for every 390 Americans...

...but hang on

More than half of all Cuban physicians work overseas, many after defecting. Doctors who remain in the country earn about $25 per month, with many instead taking jobs as taxi drivers or hotel workers, where they can make more money (The Wall Street Journal).

Cuba has a small number of higher quality clinics catering to paying medical tourists and high-level politicians. However, the majority of Cubans take their chances in filthy, under-resourced hospitals. Women regularly avoid gynecological exams "because they fear infection from unhygienic equipment and practices."

Planning to visit a Cuban hospital as a regular citizen? Plan on taking your own syringes, towels, bed sheets and soap.

United Kingdom

The National Health Service (NHS) is the U.K. version of government-run health care. It is the largest employer in Europe with more than 1.3 million employees, and has been around for 62 years. It has an annual budget equivalent to more than $160 billion (The Wall Street Journal).

It is now planning to undergo a major overhaul that will (in theory) cut high swaths of bureaucracy by eliminating a layer of financial managers. The plan is to put more power in the hands of doctors to decide how to spend the money...

...what a concept!

The plan calls for reducing management costs by more than 45 percent over the next four years. Unfortunately, placing the words "reducing management costs" and "government" in the same sentence rarely, if ever, succeeds.

Various proposals to help control hospital costs have been suggested or-on occasion-enacted. These have included removing every third light bulb in a corridor, asking patients to bring their own medicines from home, cutting the number of sterile packs used, and not changing the sheets between patients, but merely turning them over.

The Tea Leaf is a weekly economic and financial update by Jeff Thredgold, economist for Vectra Bank Colorado. He has been writing an economic update every week for the past 31 years and is the only economist in the world to have received the designation of CSP, or Certified Speaking Professional. Republished with permission from the Tea Leaf by Jeff Thredgold, whose site address is www.thredgold.com/html/leaf.html.

Enjoy this article? Sign up to get ColoradoBiz Exclusives. The opinions expressed in this article are solely that of the author and do not represent ColoradoBiz magazine. Comments on articles will be removed if they include personal attacks.

Readers Respond

I read the referenced Reuters article. Mr. Thregold has done an edit job that Andrew Breitbart would be proud of.

By Ed Stephenson on 2010 08 02

I lived in Austria for 20 years. Everyone there is covered by some kind of health insurance. Life expectancies and taxes are high but medical care by competent doctors in good facilities costs far less than equivalent treatment in America. Some doctors make house calls. Malpractice laswuites are virtually unknown. Drugs can cost no more than 2% of a person's monthly income. No one makes a vocational choice based on whether his/her job will provide insurance coverage; that is a non-issue. What is wrong with a system like that? Why do Americans have a negative knee-jerk reaction to "socialized" medicine?

By Devere Curtiss on 2010 08 02

I have worked for both government and private sector healthcare for a decade now. I found this article to be more of an opinion piece. The issues facing our healthcare system are complex and worthy of mindful articles and debates. The Kaiser Family Foundation produces some of the best non-partisan information I have seen. Their website is at www.kff.org.

By Alex Easton on 2010 08 01

Clearly the author is attempting to justify a pre-conceived aversion to a public health care system. Cuba aside, the Canadian and UK systems, along with those of the Scandanavian countries, have built-in flaws to be sure, but are able to accomplish what our system does not: fairly decent preventative care for everyone. I'm already paying for emergency-room care for the needy through my higher insurance premiums; proper preventative care for all would result in savings. I think America can offer both -- decent care for all coupled with the opportunity for private care for those want it and can afford it.

By J Little on 2010 07 29

Jeff, You've cited examples of three countries that are struggling with their health care systems. What lessons do you think we can learn from these countries that we can apply to our own struggling health care system here in the US?

By Nathan Jansch on 2010 07 29

With so many worrisome issues facing the country right now, discussion about the health care bill has slowed. But it shouldn't. There is much to discuss. Thanks for keeping us focused.

By Antonette on 2010 07 29

Lots of generalizations here with no hard facts, stats or citations to back them up. I'm open-minded and very curious about how it's working in Canada. This article does nothing to satisfy my curiosity, as it just doesn't deliver any credibility or authority.

By Dave Gardner on 2010 07 29

Leave a comment

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

ColoradoBiz TV

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

[+] View Full Size

 

Featured Video