More By This Author

How your social media may be killing your brand

Make sure it drives traffic, conversation to your domain

Current Issue

 
Tony Felice Posted 04.28.2010

How your social media may be killing your brand

Make sure it drives traffic, conversation to your domain

By Tony Felice
 

With the degree to which many companies drank the proverbial social media "Kool-Aid" last year, it's no wonder that a slew of organizations are feeling a hangover effect in 2010. Many firms are beginning to realize that all their time and money spent devising and implementing such an approach has not only failed to produce measurable results, but also damaged their own brand equity in the process.

What happened

A good number of companies jumped into Twitter, Facebook, Foursquare and other platforms over the past 12-18 months without a well conceived plan to bring those conversations back to their primary web site. Sure, discussions are occurring, and many in fact may be positive in and of themselves. However, without a solid strategy, it's very difficult to measurably tie social media back to business goals.

What's more, many companies have conducted their social media initiatives as though it were a virtual popularity contest. What is the significance of having a million fans on Facebook? Unless those fans are engaged, they represent nothing more than a collection, and the value fades faster than their memory of having clicked that button. The underlying problem is that companies have essentially offloaded hard-earned traffic from their sites as individuals opt instead to follow their Twitter and Facebook accounts almost exclusively. Worse yet, those fans and followers are orphaned by a shortsighted content strategy that ends with an editorial calendar.

This isn't the first time organizations have jumped on a bandwagon and blindly built a marketing plan around the latest shiny object. This "knee-jerk" tactical reaction to social media is not dissimilar to the dotcom gold rush of the mid nineties, when everyone needed a website, but many weren't quite sure why. The unfulfilled promise of riches, and the bubble that followed, forced many to reevaluate their priorities. More recently, we had seen throngs of people on public street corners competing for drivers' attention by twirling a life-size sign pointing to a nearby coffee shop, jewelry story or other outlet. While they're still present, their numbers are dwindling because the net effect is proving to be slim at best.

What's next

That's not to say that Twitter, Facebook and other similar platforms will die in similar fashion - what will change is the ways in which they are used. These platforms can still be valuable components to a company's comprehensive marketing strategy, but organizations will need to get smarter about how to leverage them in order to reclaim the conversation and draw attention back to their own domains.

The solution could be seen as the social media equivalent to the "hub and spoke" method many airlines use in their operations. The primary domain should always be considered the hub for social media. Most conversations should be drawn back to central areas through hyperlinks and recommendations by the originator. In doing so, customers and prospects are funneled to more detailed information and content that can help them take action, thereby increasing the potential for more conversions and sales.

 But it doesn't end there. The most successful examples are seen when social media channels are fully integrated into the brand site, allowing users to engage and share without leaving. This is not to suggest that companies should try to create their own social networks. Rather, give existing social media users access to the functionality they would find in Twitter or Facebook, and one such example of this type of integration can be seen at Threadless (http://twitter.threadless.com). A successful social media strategy requires a component that will transform followers into return visitors to your primary site.

As obvious as this may seem, it's often neglected, and many "social" approaches seen today are not social at all. Baiting hooks and throwing them into the water is not social, especially when those hooks are not tied to anything.

Organizations must not succumb to "Shiny Object Syndrome" or chase the latest fad just to keep up with perceptions. Rather, companies can leverage social media to its maximum benefit by having a concrete strategy and measurable objectives that align directly with their business and branding goals before submitting their first post. This takes a concerted and dedicated effort by both management and those responsible for its execution. Trust me, though, when I say that it's time very well spent.

Tony Felice is the Senior Strategist at Red Door Interactive, an Internet Presence Management firm with offices in San Diego and Denver that helps organizations profit from their Web initiatives. Clients include Petco, Garden Fresh Corp, California Avocado Commission, Rubio's Fresh Mexican Grill and Cricket Communications. He can be reached at tfelice@reddoor.biz.

Enjoy this article? Sign up to get ColoradoBiz Exclusives. The opinions expressed in this article are solely that of the author and do not represent ColoradoBiz magazine. Comments on articles will be removed if they include personal attacks.

Readers Respond

Tony, I read your post with interest... and I enjoyed your writing... but may I disagree a bit? The idea (if I understood it) that the best use of social media is to become subsumed in a main company website and keep clients there is, I think, not where things are going. To this point the drive has been to get people back to your main company site; effort has been largely focused on bringing traffic to a central site. But I think that model is in the process of being consumed by the changing nature of the web. For some that may be viable, but it's too expensive/involved a proposition for most businesses - especially small businesses. Most businesses still don't get most of their revenue on the web and won't for quite some time. Some never will. For the record, I'd guess that anyone who tries to build their entire corporate reputation around any one social media - or social media, in general, as currently configured - is probably going down in the long run. It's not enough for most. I suspect that the new model of market presence - especially for companies that are not destined by the nature of their industry to compete much outside a given geographic area for revenue - will continue to evolve to take in a variety of presences, each (to some extent) customized to the specific venue - whether social media, WWW company site, other marketing/communications efforts or whatever. The sum total of those parts is the new presence, I suspect. The World Wide Web isn't going to stop disintermediation and demassification. To the contrary, it's the single most profound engine of both economic movements. Company websites won't become unimportant, but I do look for them to continue to be only one piece of and ever-more-complex equation. Thanks!

By KevinCole509 on 2010 05 01

Thanks, Tonia. One of the points I'd like to make is that if sending traffic to a third party resonates with a business case, then the reclamation strategy should typically be defined before anything is implemented. Of course, there are outliers. It's difficult to provide tangible examples because there are really no one-size-fits-all answers when it comes to social channels. Knowing that, we can think of social media strategies as existing on a continuum. At one end of the spectrum, we see people putting chicklets on their site, asking their visitors to follow. At the other extreme, we would expect to see solutions that provide a very seamless experience for users as they consume and share content between social channels and the main webiste. This is the type of experience that I was trying to point out with the Threadless example. Speaking specifically about Facebook, last week the company released a suite of tools that would allow companies to create a very engaging social media experience entirely within the context of the brand site. As with all things, implentation requires some technical expertise, but the potential is incredible. You can learn more here: http://developers.facebook.com/plugins

By tony felice on 2010 04 28

Tony, I agree with your post but other than saying one should make sure that a brand's internet presence revolves around its home page you don't give any other concrete ideas. As more and more companies find that they need (because customers ask if they have) a Facebook presence, they find that their traffic is in fact effectively diverted from their home page. What would you suggest companies do to effectively bring their customers back to their home page from Twitter, Facebook, Foursquare, etc, etc...

By Tania Sole on 2010 04 28

Tony, I agree with your post. A myopic view of social media can be destructive and divert attention and funding to those things that matter. It's not to say that social media doesn't work, just that social media doesn't work when you're not developing a plan. It's no different than anything else without a plan. You wouldn't go on vacation without choosing a destination either. Thanks for the piece!

By Nan Palmero on 2010 04 28

Leave a comment

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

ColoradoBiz TV

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

[+] View Full Size

 

Featured Video