More By This Author

Current Issue

Current Issue

Posted: September 15, 2009

Jobless data: getting worse, but not quite as painful

The recession has run its course, but the bad news isn't over

Jeff Thredgold

U.S. employment data for August was a mix of "getting less painful" and "getting worse" -- both as expected.

The crux of the data was one more sign that the U.S. recession has largely run its course, although ongoing but lesser job losses and rising unemployment will remain the norm in coming months.

The U.S. economy lost a net 216,000 jobs during August, slightly better (less bad) than the 230,000 loss expected by forecasting economists. The loss was the smallest in 12 months and more than 60 percent below the average monthly job loss during 2009's first half. However, revised job data of the two prior months suggests 49,000 more jobs were lost than in previous estimates.

Goods-producing employment bore the lion's share of the losses, with a net decline of 136,000 jobs. Construction employment fell by another 65,000 jobs. Manufacturing lost 63,000 additional jobs, taking losses within the sector to two million since the "Great Recession" officially began in December 2007. Mining employment declined by 9,000 jobs during the month.

Service-providing employment fared somewhat better, with a loss of another 80,000 jobs. Professional and business services lost another 22,000 jobs, while retail trade lost 10,000 positions. Still, each sector did substantially "better" than in previous months.

The leisure and hospitality sector lost 21,000 jobs, while the government sector lost 18,000 positions, led by fewer jobs in state and local government and at the Postal Service. Better news saw the education and health services sector add another 52,000 jobs.

• The net decline of 3.08 million jobs during 2008 was the worst year since 1945. The loss of 3.85 million jobs during 2009's first eight months has already surpassed the 2008 total. The net decline of 6.93 million jobs is a painful contrast to the average gain of 1.9 million net new jobs annually during 2005 to 2007.

• The average hourly wage rose 0.3 percent (six cents) to $18.65 hourly. While the rise of 2.6 percent during the past year is meager at best, it looks more favorable versus the actual 2.1percent decline in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the most recent 12-month period ending in July.

• The average workweek held at 33.1 hours in August, just slightly above the record low of 33.0 hours in June. Many employers tend to boost hours of current workers before making new hiring additions.

• The "underemployment" rate rose to 16.8 percent in August, versus 16.3 percent in July. This rate, at its highest level since such a measurement began 15 years ago, combines the announced jobless total with those who are working part-time but prefer full-time jobs, and those discouraged workers who have given up seeking a job (and are no longer counted as unemployed).

• An estimated 14.9 million people are currently considered unemployed, the highest level since the Great Depression. The total breaks down to an average of nearly 300,000 unemployed people in each state. Five million people have been out of work for more than six months, with hundreds of thousands of construction and manufacturing jobs never to return.

• The unemployment rate for men 20 years and older rose to 10.1 percent in August from 9.8 percent in July. The jobless rate for women 20 years and older rose to 7.6 percent in August from 7.5 percent in July.

• The jobless rate for teenagers rose to a record 25.5 percent in August, up sharply from 23.8 percent in July. More conservative thinkers would suggest that the recent sharp increase in the minimum wage from $6.55 to $7.25 hourly simply made unskilled younger workers too expensive.

• The unemployment rate for Whites rose to 8.9 percent in August, versus 8.6 percent in July. The jobless rate for Blacks or African Americans rose to 15.1 percent in August, up sharply from 14.5 percent in July. The jobless rate for those of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity rose to 13 percent, also up sharply from 12.3 percent the prior month.

• "Temp" worker job losses fell to 6,500 in August, versus an average monthly loss of 51,000 jobs during 2009's first six months (The Wall Street Journal). Such a move is viewed positively, since many firms hire and fire "temp" workers before adding to more permanent payrolls. Total "temp" employment has fallen from 2.6 million to 1.7 million since the recession began, with one of every eight jobs lost in the recession a temp job.

From Here?

The vast majority of forecasting economists agree that the U.S. economy will grow during 2009's final half, as well as throughout 2010. However, a major debate rages as to the vibrancy of such economic growth, as well as how employment markets will fare.

Some see a significant growth rate between July and December 2009, with solid growth during 2010 and 2011 as well. They see job gains returning at a favorable pace, arguing that employers were very quick to cut jobs during the past year and will need to rebuild staffing levels quickly.

Others see a more modest economic growth pace, with employment gains in various months offset by net losses in other months. They point to the fact that even as the U.S. economy emerged from its prior eight-month recession in November 2001, total employment actually declined slightly during the next two years...the infamous "jobless" recovery.

By way of comparison, either scenario is much better than the enormous employment hemorrhage since the Great Recession began.

{pagebreak:Page 1}

The Tea Leaf is a weekly economic and financial update by Jeff Thredgold, economist for Vectra Bank Colorado. He has been writing an economic update every week for the past 31 years and is the only economist in the world to have received the designation of CSP, or Certified Speaking Professional. Republished with permission from the Tea Leaf by Jeff Thredgold, whose site address is www.thredgold.com/html/leaf.html.
Enjoy this article? Sign up to get ColoradoBiz Exclusives. The opinions expressed in this article are solely that of the author and do not represent ColoradoBiz magazine. Comments on articles will be removed if they include personal attacks.

Readers Respond

Leave a comment





Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:



ColoradoBiz TV

Loading the player ...

Featured Video