Edit ModuleShow Tags

The fine line between compromise and "Shove it"


Published:

I don’t believe this is the best forum for debating politics—though stirring things up is always a bit of fun…

It’s difficult to understand whether our current national politicians have a primary goal of leading and pressing a reasoned course of action or getting and staying elected.

Is the Republican Party’s current debate about potential changes to immigration policy because of values and better alignment with the Constitution’s governing principles, or is it merely to attract more Hispanic voters? Do Republicans who signed Grover Norquist’s Tax Payer Protection Pledge really believe the top income tax rate cannot be changed, or are they afraid the G-man will assault them?

Does Harry Reid really believe taxing the wealthiest among us will help our fiscal problems in a meaningful way, or is he just pandering to the masses of well- meaning but perhaps misguided 99 percenters? Did President Obama’s assaults on the banking industry before the election represent deep-seated beliefs or an understanding of how the issue played in the swing states?

I’m cynical about the answers to all of these questions.

It’s not just elected officials who contract the political disease. When staying in office becomes more important than the reasons for being there, weirdness reigns and trouble ensues—whether political office or the CEO’s suite.

To be the most effective leader possible, I believe you must be willing to get fired or quit. Somewhere between compromise and “shove it,” there’s a line to consider before acting. It’s a different line for everyone, and it moves and situations change, but it’s worth considering before you encounter it. Unfortunately, the amount of the paycheck ends up being one of the most considered factors when executives are presented with otherwise untenable situations.

I recently had lunch with a CEO whose perspective I appreciate. Discussing an upcoming board meeting, he described an issue on which he was at odds with an influential board member. He’d already figured out where his line was, identified his negotiating strategy and considered his options. More leader than politician, he’d determined that staying employed at his current firm wasn’t as important to him as doing the right thing.

Yes, you must get elected to govern and you need to have political skill to get to the C-suite. But as Colin Powell once said, “Being responsible sometimes means pissing people off.”
 

Edit Module
Todd Ordal

Todd Ordal is president of Applied Strategy®. Todd helps CEOs achieve better financial results, become more effective leaders and sleep easier at night. He is a former CEO and has led teams as large as 7,000. Todd is the author of Never Kick a Cow Chip On A Hot Day: Real Lessons for Real CEOs and Those Who Want To Be (Morgan James Publishing, 2016). Connect with Todd on LinkedIn, Twitter, call 303-527-0417 or email todd@toddordal.com.

Get more of our current issue | Subscribe to the magazine | Get our Free e-newsletter

Edit ModuleShow Tags

Archive »Related Articles

How to avoid the same lame sales questions

Stupid questions anger and waste your prospects' time. Lame questions close doors and opportunities. Lazy questions destroy your trust and credibility. Continuing to spout the same-o-lame-o questions is a recipe for disaster.

Why we need to feed the tech talent pipeline

Colorado currently has more than 16,000 open computing jobs with an average salary of $92,000. So is the gap solely due to a lack in talent, or to the evaluation process when seeking the right talent?

Why Clear Creek County faces tough decisions

Molybdenum ore has been clawed out of the Henderson Mine since 1976. Property taxes from mine operator Freeport-McMoRan are crucial to government operations in Clear Creek County. Those revenues, though, are expected to end soon.
Edit ModuleShow Tags

Thanks for contributing to our community-- please keep your comments in good taste and appropriate for our business professional readers.

Add your comment: