More By This Author

Current Issue

Current Issue

Posted: January 13, 2011

The politics of personal destruction

We need to relearn how to debate and argue without threatening rhetoric

Aaron Harber

The tragic events in Tucson bring home the point that America's political dialog needs to change now. As the ultimate sacrifices made due to the Politics of Personal Destruction demonstrated, we need to relearn how to debate and argue without the threatening rhetoric so commonly unleashed today.

While most Americans calmly evaluate wild assertions and don't give credence to calls for "action" against "targeted" individuals (such as those who are illustrated with gun-sights on their districts, offices, homes, or persons), the reality is a small segment of the population is differently affected --- misguidedly believing such calls are justifications for violence.

If we don't begin to make changes now, we will scare off many of the best people we could have as public servants and leaders. Already intimidated by the nonstop litany of false accusations made in attack ads and rationally concerned about the lack of privacy holding office entails, highly qualified citizens otherwise willing to serve will be intimidated further by the possibility of loss of their lives as well as harm to their loved ones.

Democrats and Republicans alike have effectively deployed the Politics of Personal Destruction with its efficacy reaching new heights in 2010 due to (1) the disconnect between candidate campaigns (where personal responsibility still exists) and third party groups (who have no palpable accountability whatsoever) and (2) the consistent effectiveness of Negative Advertising. Third party organizations have free rein to say anything without direct repercussions and, as a result, have lowered the political realm even further than once imagined.

It is time for every American to take the actions necessary to restore civility to the process and to reject the approaches so effectively used today. By educating ourselves on the issues, by listening to different points of view, and by learning how to "disagree agreeably," we can mitigate the effectiveness of contemporary wicked approaches.

The Media needs to play an even greater role than ever before in promoting this change. We will require leadership at all levels as a purposeful effort must be deployed to consistently, fairly, and objectively inform and engage the public --- with the Media challenging us daily to do better. And as each of us makes the commitment to learn more, to become better-informed, and to work at becoming more tolerant of opinions different from our own --- we can change and improve America.

One initiative just starting in Colorado is a new public affairs television program titled "Colorado Now!" Its purpose is to allow citizens to see their public officials firsthand and to show how, when diverse perspectives and people meet, there can be productive exchanges which are civil and mutually respectful. For more information, please go to www.HarberTV.com/CoNow .
{pagebreak:Page 1}

Aaron Harber hosts "The Aaron Harber Show" seen on Channel 3 KCDO-TV (K3 Colorado) on Sundays at 8:00 pm and at www.HarberTV.com . He also hosts "Colorado Election 2010 TM" seen Sundays at 8:30 pm on Channel 3 and on Mondays at 8:00 pm on COMCAST Entertainment Television and is viewable 24/7 at www.Colorado2010.com . Send e-mail to Aaron@HarberTV.com.

Enjoy this article? Sign up to get ColoradoBiz Exclusives. The opinions expressed in this article are solely that of the author and do not represent ColoradoBiz magazine. Comments on articles will be removed if they include personal attacks.

Readers Respond

I do think it IS important for our LEADERS to show more dignity when it comes to the words coming out of their mouth...They ARE suppose to be setting a higher standard!.. what happened in Tucson however, is happening EVERY DAY, to ordinary citizens across this country BECAUSE we have allowed GUNS and a COWBOY MENTALITY to proliferate in our communities. The Constitution may give us the 'right to bear arms', but can't we decide WHO and WHERE we have the right to bear arms? When we allow automatic weapons to be sold like candy, with very little 'screening' of who buys them, and continue to allow gun-slingin' antiquated laws, then we will continue to experience the horrifying results of our actions. If we live by the sword, it's likely we will surely die by the sword... By Annie on 2011 01 13
Aaron if you think this nut case had anything to do with politics you are mistaken. If anything, this should tell us to stop worrying about being "politically correct" and when we notice something bad festering, take care of it. We complain about the political dialog but it was worse a century ago. By Mark Kuta on 2011 01 13

Leave a comment





Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:



ColoradoBiz TV

Loading the player ...

Featured Video