Trumponomics vs. Reaganomics: No repeating and no rhyming

Will history teach us anything as Trump strives to stimulate the economy?

Mark Twain said:

 “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.”

The question is: Will this be the case for the nation’s new administration?

President Donald Trump has outlined his pro-growth initiatives to stimulate the economy and has clearly taken a page out of former President Ronald Reagan’s playbook.

Reagan’s campaign focused on fiscal stimulus, lower taxes, less government interference (regulation), and a strong national defense – collectively termed Reaganomics. In November 2016, I heard a similar storyline, only this time it was coined Trumponomics.

While these actions worked to stimulate the economy during Reagan’s administration, will they produce the same results this time around? And if not, what does that mean for our economy?

While history may not repeat itself, as Twain poetically said, we don’t think it will rhyme either in today’s dramatically different economic environment.

A look back – fiscal stimulus in the 1980s:

Several important acts passed by the Reagan administration worked effectively, beginning with the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, which lowered the top marginal tax bracket from 70 percent to 50 percent. The Job Training Partnership Act of 1982 was signed into law next, creating the first public-private partnerships to create jobs. In 1986, Reagan launched the Tax Reform Act, simplifying the tax code.

Reagonomics’ resolution – intended and unintended:

There’s no question there were some positive economic results during Reagan’s administration. Unemployment declined from a peak of 10.8 percent in 1982 to 5.4 percent when he left office. Real gross domestic product (GDP) averaged 3.5 percent during his presidency with a high of 9.4 percent in 1983.

However, there was a byproduct – the national debt. The U.S. debt nearly tripled from $997 billion to $2.85 trillion.

Déjà vu? Not quite – the new plot thickens

Presently, we don’t know exactly how Trumponomics will play out, but I have a sense of déjà vu. The material difference to their platforms is that we are not at the same stage in the economic cycle, so the results may vary.

Unlike the Reagan era, we are not coming out of a recession, just the opposite – we are late in the current economic cycle.

Key differences include:

Unemployment rate

  • When Reagan took office, the unemployment rate was 7.5 percent and by 1982 it peaked at 10.8 percent.
  • Today the unemployment rate stands at 4.8 percent and appears to be headed lower, or at least stabilizing.

Interest rates

  • Interest rates peaked in 1981, with long-term rates hitting 15.8 percent. And as inflation was breaking down, interest rates lowered quickly.
  • Today, long-term interest rates are 2.5 percent and headed higher, with inflation being virtually non-existent.

Free trade and immigration

  • Reagan was for free trade and immigration. In the early 1980s, there was a surge in immigration, which helped support labor force growth.
  • Trump is for fair-free trade and controlled immigration, which means we could see less immigration under the Trump program.

Factual foreshadowing

Let’s assume that some of Trump’s plans are executed this year. Will they translate into significantly faster economic growth?  Probably not. The reality is, even with all the positive items that occurred with Reagan’s fiscal stimulus, Reaganomics did not produce an overwhelming boom for the economy.

Economic epilogue

All this being said, we do suggest that fiscal stimulus will be beneficial for the U.S. economy in 2017, and that economic growth will accelerate to 2.5 percent, up from 1.6 percent in 2016. The Fed’s forecast is slightly more conservative at 2.1 percent real GDP in 2017.

One item to remember is that it’s still early; we are not certain what Trump and his administration will accomplish. However, if he is successful in implementing many of his initiatives, we may have higher interest rates, an increase in inflation and continued strength in the dollar. We are confident we will also experience an improvement in economic activity

Categories: Economy/Politics