More By This Author

Has Colorado put out the “closed for business” sign?

Short-sighted measures make the state far less attractive

Current Issue

 
Diane Schwenke Posted 03.11.2010

Has Colorado put out the “closed for business” sign?

Short-sighted measures make the state far less attractive

By Diane Schwenke
 

Businesses across the state have recently been taken by surprise and alarmed by a package of bills proposed by the Governor and passed by the Legislature in record time, which took effect March 1. The bills were aimed at helping to fill the state’s current budget gap by eliminating or reducing state tax credits and exemptions for businesses in Colorado.


These measures have been used across our state for decades to help companies keep and grow jobs. The increase in taxes paid by the private sector as a result of this package will make it more difficult to keep jobs in Colorado and lure new ones to our State in the future.


We know that Colorado is facing unprecedented economic challenges. Unemployment statewide is 7.5 percent and locally it is 9 percent. We continue to hope that the state and local economy is positioned to return to stability and growth this year. However, the decisions we make now, in both the private and public sector, are critical to achieving that goal.


Colorado has very little ammunition to lure business. While other states are rapidly adding incentive packages to attract companies, we are removing several of the key provisions in our limited arsenal. As the country rebounds from the current economic woes, businesses are looking for opportunities to take advantage of an educated workforce and reasonable property costs.


They will be looking for additional incentives to relocate or expand their operations. Colorado will now have less to offer them based on the recent work of the Colorado General Assembly. In fact, we may have just put out the “Closed” sign in terms of the overall message we have sent business, particularly when compared with other states that are seeking jobs for their citizens.


We know the state’s budget problems are severe. We understand the challenges our elected officials face; the private sector has been experiencing and managing the very same issues. Nonetheless, it is short-sighted to balance the budget with one-time funding sources and the removal of economic policies that drive job growth and ultimately tax revenue.


Colorado’s business community contributed, in the past two years, more than $330 million in cash funds and forgone revenue with the repeal of the vendor fee ( a program where the state paid business to collect state sales tax, which business now does at its own expense) to shore up the state’s budget shortfall. This year, we will continue to do what we can to get our state finances back on track.


In the coming year, the $800 million dollar deficit in the Unemployment Insurance Fund will have to be replenished as well-state government does not cover that cost, business does. Finally, we expect we will also be paying an increased property tax rate due to plummeting home values and the constitutional requirement that business make up the difference in those property tax rates. All that, while trying to cope with the loss of revenue in their own businesses at the same time. The total cost of the actions taken previously by policy makes along with this anticipated deficit in the Unemployment Insurance fund will be well beyond $1 billion over a few short years. That was BEFORE this most recent action.


Business is already contributing to help the state close the budget gap. With this latest legislative action the primary job and tax generators of this State are being required to do even more. There will be unintended consequences. Dollars that could have gone into job growth will be going to pay sales tax on energy used to manufacture a ceramic component part at CoorsTek which must compete internationally for sales, or to pay sales tax on the takeout boxes that a Nick and Willy’s pizza comes in. Make no mistake this will affect the bottom line costs of many small businesses as well as large ones…at a time when they can least afford it.


If this recession has shown nothing else, it has shown the direct correlation between the fate of free enterprise and the fate of government budgets. One cannot help but wonder then, why lawmakers in this State choose to make it tougher for free enterprise to return to the profitability that will be required to in order to have more sustainable state tax revenues.


In 2010, as the Chamber and as the local business community, we will continue doing what we can to get our economy back on track. But we cannot do that alone. We, along with other business associations across the State urge our elected officials within the Colorado General Assembly to join us in this goal, to see business as the ally we are in moving this state forward and to partner to promote activities that lead to jobs for Coloradans.


Diane Schwenke is the president and chief executive officer of the Grand Junction Area Chamber of Commerce.

Enjoy this article? Sign up to get ColoradoBiz Today, our e-mail newsletter that delivers exclusive editorial material, video interviews of area newsmakers and executives, and original business articles straight to your inbox. Last updated on Mar 10, 2010 at 09:46 AM

Readers Respond

I think the bigger issue is identification of what services the state government is to perform. During the good periods (previous decade) budgets expand to use every single dollar the government receives. Budgets and programs should be able to expand and contract with the income that is coming in. Unfortunately the various entitlement programs, and expectations of what government is supposed to provide vs. what is needed allows for the expansion of programs to continue unchecked in the good years and then causes the government to increase funding sources (tax, fees ect) during the bad years to keep the same level of resources available. The problem is that these programs are never identified as optional, but become a component of the self-sustaining bureaucracy. Very rarely will you see a program that would voluntarily terminate itself in leantimes. The management and employees that are put in place for it would be out of employment as well, and generally speaking in an over leveraged/debt laden individual is not going to do that. FYI, this also occurs in the private sector as well.

An additional observation, is that government is generally run by lawyers, who understand law. The legal business is one of the simplest "consulting" type of businesses you can run. There's no accountability in the form of performance. Essentially if you don't perform/suceed, you get compensated. If you succeed, sometimes the upside is much larger, but you have a baseline that you are essentially guaranteed a given rate. This is what I think again is the mentality of where the government operates from. Essentially, in the legal business I am guaranteed a bare minimum compensation via a retainer ect.

I think the basic problem is that until you get real business men, and have some accountability back to the people more often than every 4-6 years, you will be unable to resolve the issue of accountability. Without individuals (needs to be many more than just 1) willing to subject themselves to the utmost public scruitiny and show real leadership this logjam of better qualified candidates will never materialize. Many of accomplished business people would not want to go through the process because its generally more lucrative to stay in the private sector. So the question is how do you get these people? (I do not know, any thoughts?)

When times are lean, pay raises are froze or pay may even be reduced in companies. I haven't followed the local legislature dealing that closely, but I don't perceive that to be case in this situation nor at the federal level.

Accountability is the key differentiator on successful vs. unsuccessful businesses. You can be unaccountable for a period of time, but eventually it catches up to you most of the times. The problem is we're playing with a stacked deck, and really will never be able to succeed until some sort of real accountability is developed.

I have some thoughts, such as salary increases and reductions based on how well the state performs each year, but you cannot have the people who making the rules who will benefit from them. Thoughts? By T Boon on 2010 03 15
You are so right on. Bill Withers and the rest of the "dopes in the dome" (legislators) are so intent on stepping over dollars to save pennies!

Thank you!

Bob Campbell By Bob Campbell on 2010 03 11
I am in the orchard business and I will be taking my trees out when they get mature.
Wendell Walcher By Wendell Walcher on 2010 03 11
I have a peach orchard, and I assure you there is rarely, if ever, a profit in this business. Width additional taxes, such as taxes on chemicals and fertilizer, fuel, vehicle taxes etc. It will be impossible to make a profit. Therefor, when my trees reach maturity, I plan to take them out, and quiting the fruit business.
Wendell Walchwer By Wendell Walcher on 2010 03 11
Colorado has become another tax and spend with its cuts in incentives. Anyone who searches business opportunities on the Internet will find us sitting in the bottom 10.
Bankers don't make government and SBA loans. Government has no incentives for relocation unless you are a multi-million dollar corporation. We as business people need to say no, get it together and make it business friendly or our downtown will look like Detroit. By Jeff Fischer on 2010 03 11
On a local level, the constant attack on Urban Renewal Authorities is also making it difficult for local tax dollars to be redirected to redevelopment areas. New legislation will surely pass this year to limit local government from providing these incentives.

Watch and see how difficult redevelopment is without these incentives as well... By Jim on 2010 03 11
Colorado is closed for private business but open for government projects. Drive anywhere between Golden and the Capitol and enjoy the debt driven economy of the "intrastructure" build out while the bridges of 6th Avenue crumble.

For decades, the Denver metro area has been an economy dominated by by government dollars. That's why the growth is slow and tough for businesses on the Front Range.

The three largest employment sectors in the Denver marketplace and controlled by government: 1) medical (substantially funded by Medicare, Medcaid, VA hospital, SCHip, state & federal research grants; 2) federal & state government (largest concentration of government employees outside of Washington), and 3) education (taxpayer funds or government back debt for students).

Without a state government that is more progessive on business instead of social issues, Colorado will be a dust bowl for private business. Denver is on a island and requires the importing of dollars for other markets - thankfully we are a tourist destination. By Tom on 2010 03 11
Very well written letter, Diane. It seems like the current administration has misallocated revenues for items that don't focus on productivity. Just EXACTLY what economist insist the - or rather all -government does.

There is only one way to get out of our current problem and that is to focus on the asset side of the state balance sheet. That requires strong business growth and productivity growth. Maybe the next governor will be someone who has actually held a job in private industry and who DOESN'T have a JD degree! By Mark on 2010 03 11

Leave a comment

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

ColoradoBiz TV

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

[+] View Full Size

 

Featured Video