More By This Author

Current Issue

Current Issue

Posted: January 28, 2010

Mandated sick leave is back

We opposed it before, and we oppose it now

Although the bill has not yet been introduced, the 15-page bill draft mandates that employers provide one hour of paid sick leave for each 30 hours worked by an employee up to the following limits for these sizes of firms:

• 72 hours maximum if the firm has ten or more employees; and
• 40 hours maximum if the firm has nine or fewer workers.

The bill will be sponsored by Representative Cherylin Peniston (D-Westminster) and is being mainly advocated by 9to5, the National Association of Working Women (http://www.9to5.org/).

Traditionally opposing governmental mandates on employers, CACI specifically opposes this draft legislation for a number of reasons, including the following:

• The bill draft notes that a worker could take sick leave to care for other "family members," but the definition of family members is overly broad;

• The bill draft would allow a worker to roll over unused sick days into the following year;

• A CACI survey of members last summer found that 83 percent already have sick-leave policies;

•   Businesses would face an additional administrative cost to comply with the law;

• The draft bill will apparently apply to part-time workers, which would hit the restaurant, lodging and retail sectors hard;

• Companies should have the flexibility to devise sick-leave policies that are unique to each firm's economic circumstances and workforce without being forced by State Government to adopt a "one-size-fits-all" model.

During the 2009 legislative session, CACI strongly opposed a similar bill, which died in the first "committee of reference" where it was heard: the House Business Affairs and Labor Committee, chaired by Representative Joe Rice (D-Littleton). The CACI Business Affairs and Labor Committee discussed the draft bill and unanimously voted to oppose it.

{pagebreak:Page 1}

 

Enjoy this article? Sign up to get ColoradoBiz Exclusives. The opinions expressed in this article are solely that of the author and do not represent ColoradoBiz magazine. Comments on articles will be removed if they include personal attacks.

Readers Respond

This is one more dumb idea. According to your own survey 83% of companies already have this. If you are working for one of the 17% and this benefit is important to you, who is the dumb one? Let the free marketplace take care of itself and it will eventually weed out the employers that think so little of their employees. I'll bet the 17% are all hourly employees not salaired. If you are not at work why then should you get paid? If it is necessary that government tell business owners how to run their business, let the government take over the business and destroy all free enterprise. That way we can all have a government job. It used to be that the government job typically paid less but had better benefits than the private sector, now government workers get paid better and have much better benefits than the private sector. And they do a loosy job of it in most cases. We need the government to stay out of the day to day policies of running a business. This is not a policy that needs to be requlated. Let the marketplace take care of this. By Scott Kennerly on 2010 01 28

Leave a comment





Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:



ColoradoBiz TV

Loading the player ...

Featured Video