Edit ModuleShow Tags

Tweet from Uncle Sam:



Social media can get employers in trouble. Without a narrowly-tailored policy guiding how the company will manage its employees' use of sites like Linked-in, Facebook and Twitter while the employee is on the job, the employer may very well run afoul of the National Labor Relations Act, which is enforced by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

The NLRB's avid interest in social media stems from its charge to ensure that both union and non-union employees' federal right to discuss the terms and conditions of employment, including wages, hours and other working conditions, is protected.

The increased interest by the NLRB in matters affecting employees' use of social media began late last year. At that time, the federal agency filed a complaint against a Connecticut employer for terminating an employee who had posted negative comments about a supervisor on Facebook. The NLRB tweeted this past winter that the case had settled. The employer agreed to: (1) revise its social media policies to ensure that the employees are guaranteed the right to discuss the terms and conditions of employment; and (2) never discipline or fire employees for engaging in such activity in the future.

In Arizona, an Arizona Daily Star reporter was terminated for inappropriate and unprofessional tweets. The termination resulted in the employee filing an unfair labor practice charge with the NLRB against the Star. After investigation, the NLRB dismissed the charge, concluding that the termination was lawful because the tweets at issue did not relate to the terms and conditions of employment.

Recently, the NLRB announced its intention to file a civil complaint against Thomson Reuters for firing a reporter for one of her tweets. The tweet read: "One way to make this the best place to work is to deal honestly with Guild members." According to the NLRB, Thomson Reuters violated the reporter's federal right to comment on the terms and conditions of her employment.

The NLRB's growing interest in social media, as it relates to employees, demonstrates that there is a line to be drawn between protected and non-protected activity taking place in cyberspace. Determining where to draw that line is challenging. Even the NLRB recognizes the fast-moving nature of emerging social media issues in the context of employee-protected activity.

Last spring, the NLRB's Office of the General Counsel issued a memorandum requiring regional offices to submit social media cases to the NLRB's Division of Advice for review prior to issuing an administrative complaint. The memorandum states that prosecution of social media cases must be handled by the Division of Advice because there is virtually no case law currently available and the NLRB considers the issue a policy priority.

As these stories and events show, now, more than ever, employers need guidance about social media in and around their workplaces. We would like to hear from you about your issues and questions related to social media and your business. Please post a comment below this story and we may address your issue in the next edition of our Social Media Series.

{pagebreak:Page 1}

Edit Module

Get more of our current issue | Subscribe to the magazine | Get the Free e-newsletter

Edit ModuleShow Tags

Archive »Related Articles

Flying Horse names new sales director

Jeffrey Howell has joined The Lodge at Flying Horse as director of sales and marketing.

Top five biggest mistakes in blended-family estate plans

A blended family is one where one or both spouses have children from previous relationships. Their estate planning needs can be quite different from those of families where all the children are from the current marriage.

Monkeys, geese, cans and talent strategy

When you locate your company in a place where people want to live such as Colorado, you’re already one step ahead of the competition for talent. But only one step.